Skip to main content
Check and provide your planning data

BETA This is a new service – your feedback will help us to improve it.

Back to dataset table
East Hampshire District Council

Tree

There is a problem

  • 1000 entries with tree-preservation-order field must match the reference field in the tree preservation order

1467

reference
925-tree-1
name
1467
tree-preservation-order

undefined

925-tpo-1
uprn
address-text
point
POINT (-1.034604 50.876919)
geometry
MULTIPOLYGON (((-1.034548 50.876913,-1.034550 50.876924,-1.034558 50.876934,-1.034570 50.876942,-1.034586 50.876948,-1.034604 50.876950,-1.034621 50.876948,-1.034637 50.876943,-1.034650 50.876935,-1.034658 50.876925,-1.034661 50.876914,-1.034659 50.876903,-1.034651 50.876893,-1.034639 50.876885,-1.034623 50.876880,-1.034605 50.876878,-1.034588 50.876879,-1.034572 50.876884,-1.034559 50.876892,-1.034551 50.876902,-1.034548 50.876913)))
notes
felled-date
entry-date
2026-08-06
start-date
end-date

How to fix this issue

Your data is missing a tree-preservation-order.

The tree guidance explains how to fix the issue:

tree-preservation-order

The reference for the tree preservation order that affects this tree.

Example: TPO1

This diagram shows the relationship between the tree preservation order dataset and the tree dataset. The reference value from your tree preservation order dataset needs to match the tree-preservation-order value in your tree dataset.

How to improve East Hampshire District Council’s data

  1. Fix the errors indicated
  2. Use the check service to make sure the data meets the standard
  3. Publish the updated data on the endpoint URL